> They are pretty clear that 1.5 Pro is better than GPT-4 in general, and therefore we have a new LLM-as-judge leader, which is pretty interesting

I fully disagree, they compare Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT4 only on context length, not on other tasks where they compare it only to other Gemini which is a strange self-own.

I'm convinced that if they do not show the results against GPT4/Claude, it is because they do not look good.