It's a clumsy stretch to label anything outside your presumably very narrow view on European history as being "openly white-supremacist". I think you've lost the plot, my friend.

How can you tell? This is a genuine question about trying understand how people get any information out of the Twitter interface. All I can find are hundreds of architectural desire posts sprinkled with some religious ones before having no idea how to try a different way and giving up.

If it is, then it's certainly not very good at it. Scrolling back the past 6 months, I see only tweets about U.S. and European architecture and urban planning. There are indications that the account owner is religious, and grumbles about "wokeism" to the extent of secularlism being anti-religion, but that's about as insidious as it got.

Got any citations other than "He's too interested in Europe", or "He continues to tweet on X post-Elon"?

Serious accusations like this require more explicit evidence. One of the more significant contributions of Western culture are concepts like "innocent until proven guilty" and the "burden of proof lies with the accuser".

It seems more like an SA type ideology, not really white supremacist per se (in fact, most SA fascists are fairly harmless, they're just really into like, traditional life and beauty and going back to the earth and shit--though that does sometimes involve deporting all the minorities).

The problem isn't that they're fascists, they are actually really bad with political organizing and gaining power because they so severely reject modernity. The problem is that they get duped by the SS types and then when they rise to power they just kill all the SA guys (its what happened in Germany).

Source?

I love how you're right, that account is flagrantly white-supremacist, and everyone is downvoting your comment.

Very carefully and deliberately sprinkled among the posts are pro-Russian and leading questions designed to allow for "frank and earnest discussion" in the replies.

Questions like:

Why don't you live in London? With a cute picture of a London neighborhood. A question that has been explicitly asked to elicit "because the muslims are ruining everything" in the comments.

Why don't we make art like this anymore? With a renaissance painting. A question that has explicitly been asked to elicit "Because the radical trans-feminists are destroying art and culture" in the comments.

Why doesn't paris have architecture anymore? With a picture of an 1800s cafe. A question that has been explicitly asked to elicit "because the globalists want to homogenize everything that matters and increase the diversity of everything that doesn't matter."

What's the craziest thing you've heard of in the name of self-care? A question that has been explicitly asked to elicit "Open borders as "self care" for nations to "increase birth rates"."

This method of social media proselytization is very common and has been honed over the last 20 or so years to very slowly and deliberately introduce white supremacist ideas while cloaking the posts themselves in a veneer of respectability.

My assertion is that the people downvoting your comment are either white supremacists, or too stupid to realize they're being played.

All of my "because the..." responses were pulled directly from top-level responses to their "call and response" posts, btw.

The newsletter the account's bio links to removes the veil.