>making millions soaking businesses with patents that should never have been granted.
Invalidity arguments and IPRs suddenly aren't things?
Invalidity arguments and IPRs suddenly aren't things?
Presumption of validity is what makes patent trolling more lucrative than other forms of predatory litigation. You're guilty until proven innocent, because the law assumes that the patent office is generally doing the right thing.
It's just an evidentiary presumption that is trivially rebutted with any evidence.
I'm sure that you're aware that when you go to court, the result is never certain. Bad ruling happen all the time.