So the organisers want hinder anyone from talking about their event? That seems a really bad and counter productive decision.
People using your brand to refer to your product in normal modes of communication isn't a violation of your trademark in the first place, and does not need to be defended against.
But I have absolutely no knowledge about the event, so if anyone has a more informed opinion, I would be very interested.
The article is dumb because it misses this very important point. Yes, it's ok for you and me to write about the Super Bowl in many contexts, but it's not ok for us to appropriate their branding for our own commercial gain -- and most people who own IP would be probably be ok with that.