Governments which are still closer to being democratically elected than the C-suite of these "successful companies". I'll take the lesser of the two evils, thanks.
Politicians on the other hand, like Mr. Trump, are usually born-rich buffoons who do anything to win, and after they win, many of them exercise their power with intolerance and arrogance. Politicians climb the ranks using their money and power, not by developing technical skills, or learning important crafts.
The Great Man theory is trumped by the "Went to the right schools and my parents have connections" theory. For both C-suite and politicians.
In the face of politicians vs C-suite business men, you know, it's the politicians that have the authority and power, and they are at the crux to yield it responsibly. C-suite business men are like ants to the politicians - powerless in comparison with the powers of the lawmakers.
As a result, it's not so much of C-suite business men being just, as it's about politicians being unjust.
At least in our neoliberal system all these assholes are counter-powers to each other. Too bad for the environment, though.
> These C-suite successful companies were at least built and designed by successful people, who succeeded by being moral human beings at least more moral
Ah yes, the famous morality of big tobacco, as well as big oil, big pharma, big agrochemestry and now big tech.
Big anything?
Usually these discussions get end with everything being miraculously cured if we all go libertarian.
Well, going more libertarian would be a great start.