It's essentially a "construct your baseline" problem faced in many domains, the Fifth and other IPCC reports:
This IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C uses the reference period 1850–1900 to represent pre-industrial temperature.
This is the earliest period with near-global observations and is the reference period used as an approximation of preindustrial temperatures in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.
~ IPCC FAQ: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/12/SR15_FAQ_Low_Res.pdf
and naturally there are many papers that consider alternate baselines, data quality, proxies, etc. eg:Estimating Changes in Global Temperature since the Preindustrial Period (2017)
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/98/9/bams-d-...
^^ Discussed in brief: https://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2017/defining-pre-industr...
You mean incorrectly?
Also, if I had to guess, proxies that show global warming to be bad are widely publicised, whilst proxies that show global warming not to occur are ignored.
You are mixing categories. One is about the observable universe, ie. "does global warming happen"? The other one is a value judgement, ie. "is global warming bad?"
Sometimes it feels hotter or colder than the mercury would indicate, after all.
QED, it is impossible to determine if the climate is changing.