At the same time, the risk of war has been downplayed ever since the fall of the Soviet Union.
At the same time, the risk of war has been downplayed ever since the fall of the Soviet Union.
Read into that what you will, but it sounds very geopolitical to me.
Currently, sure. But it's possible to load enough nuclear fuel from Australia on a rowboat to power Germany for 10 years (that would be about a suitcase).
The important event was Chernobyl in 1986, from then on it was pretty much clear that Germany would leave nuclear power behind (and this was the Green party's main agenda, and what made them 'big' during the 90's).
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/sanction-gerhard-schr-de...
Not defending Schröder in any way, just pointing at some discurs issues.
If an event has never happened, and the risks have been adequately mitigated, no, I don’t see the need to worry.
The fact that this is a very common German word should tell you something about the complicated relationship of the Germans to nuclear energy ;)
While Schroeder might have had his own interests in mind and eventually became Putin's useful idiot, the shutdown of nuclear power was a popular opinion in Germany at least as far back as Chernobyl and then reinforced by Fukushima.