No, recipe is not the same as blueprint. As I posted just upthread, a blueprint has a lot more detailed information than a recipe.
In addition to that, a blueprint has a different kind of information. A blueprint for a human body, for example, would tell you the general plan of the body, where the organs go, how things are connected, etc. Yes, it might leave small details, like the exact location of each minor blood vessel or nerve fiber, up to the constructors, but it still is giving you an overall plan.
DNA, however, does not do anything like this. DNA information is more like (I'm giving time frames off the top of my head here, so they're probably off, but I think the general idea is correct) "at week 1 after fertilization, split into three layers; at week 3, start differentiating cell types in each layer; at week 5..." and so on. And even that information is very incomplete; it's depending on a lot of external factors to be a certain way, like blood supply from the mother, particular hormones being present at particular times in particular concentrations, etc. There is nowhere in any of that where it says "the final body in general has a head, torso, two arms, two legs, the heart goes here, the brain goes here", etc. All of those things are emergent results from the process. So much more like a recipe than a blueprint.