There's mountains of evidence that shows how they regularly fleece artists. Just last week this site hosted a story that researched how they're now using AI to generate fake music to avoid paying artists even further.
They pay a fortune to Joe Rogan, a man who is willfully destroying the country by spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.
This company is responsible for so, so much damage.
Could you source this, please? I've missed it.
> There's mountains of evidence that shows how they regularly fleece artists.
70+% of revenue goes to pay licences, a lot of artists have bad deals with their labels and get shafted from that revenue, deals like labels taking 50-70% of the licencing deals, historically it has been extremely common for labels to shafts artists, way before the internet age.
Do people still fall for this FUD?
If you have actual arguments, please list them. Otherwise don't insinuate with far-left dog whistles.
I’m sure paid Spotify users would like freedom of choice just as much as the Apple customers they’re supposedly advocating for. Until they address this, as well as support for devices that aren’t Spotify Connect™ devices (like HomePods), they’re being hypocritical.
And if Apples ecosystem wasn't so locked down I could write a HomePod client using librespot and Daniel Ek could get however mad he wants about it.
Sure, people would still worry about using such software, but from an engineering standpoint, unless there's a signed Spotify Connect chip that for some reason can't be emulated, there isn't much Spotify can do to detect well-implemented reverse engineered API clients.
Not something you throw together in a day obviously, but definitely not impossible.
But I agree with you in general!
Ironically, if the Apple ecosystem wasn't so locked down the open source community would have solved this issue by now.