There are lots of studies that does that. Here is one https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664031/
The paper you've posted directly cites Aggarwal five times. Most of the references that aren't by Aggarwal cite him. The entire literature on curcumin is a house of cards built on fraudulent research.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.10402...
It's a valid idea to critique Aggarwal for plagiarism but counter-productive to completely debunk the years of research that has gone into curcumin by other researchers.