Innovation stalls, improvements take longer to materialize. Machines become obsolete but there's nothing to replace it yet.
Fewer people in fundamental roles is a risk, a danger to our economic chain. We could become quite vulnerable, even crash.
Innovation stalls, improvements take longer to materialize. Machines become obsolete but there's nothing to replace it yet.
Fewer people in fundamental roles is a risk, a danger to our economic chain. We could become quite vulnerable, even crash.
As someone whose managed a team before, there is a minimum population of people practically required to sustain a particular corpus of actionable information without suffering severe degradation in terms of said information's application.
Once one ends up below that point; things tend to go the way "from scratch rediscovery required", until such time as the population of people capable of acting on it is restored.
Whether that actually happens is a prioritization decision balancing against everything else that still has to be done.