All knowledge and skills depends on memory.
That's what spaced repetition promised. In reality, it's a lot harder to figure out how to use, and often people only remember low-value knowledge and facts instead.
All knowledge and skills depends on memory.
That's what spaced repetition promised. In reality, it's a lot harder to figure out how to use, and often people only remember low-value knowledge and facts instead.
I can see incremental reading being good for researchers who might benefit from widely and incrementally reading an enormous number of papers over time. But in general, I think you get more improvements in knowledge and skills by going deep into one resource as opposed to going broad. Not to say you can't do both though.
Spaced repetition seemingly falls into the same problem, it's easy to fall in the trap of making more and more cards without questioning whether or not you'd be better off doing other tasks to solidify your learnings.