Ok, it's quite possible I just didn't understand the writing. How about this part?
> Disney shareholders were once over $200 billion wealthier than they are now
Is that an exaggeration?
> Disney shareholders were once over $200 billion wealthier than they are now
Is that an exaggeration?
https://filmthreat.com/news/male-and-pale-is-stale-responses...
As a result, the money generated by the industry has seen a
remarkably noticeable drop. The rise of the term “flop buster”
(in response to so many films like Indiana Jones and the
Dial of Destiny underperforming at the box office) seems to
be directly related to mainstream audiences’ wholesale rejection
of the over-messaging they see hijacking entertainment.
addresses your "it's just nature of Box Office" flopping argument