https://dioxindorms.com/content/chronology.html
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41271-018-0146-8
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/24/monsanto...
https://dioxindorms.com/content/chronology.html
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41271-018-0146-8
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/24/monsanto...
https://www.who.int/news/item/14-07-2023-aspartame-hazard-an...
https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/statement/2023/06/widely-u...
But you just threw that in with Agent Orange. I declare this a canonical example of someone with an axe to grind.
> The committee therefore reaffirmed that it is safe for a person to consume within this limit per day. For example, with a can of diet soft drink containing 200 or 300 mg of aspartame, an adult weighing 70kg would need to consume more than 9–14 cans per day to exceed the acceptable daily intake, assuming no other intake from other food sources.
Read about Bayer's predecessors legacy during II WW of "medical" experimentation on humans in concentration camps, enslavement, tortures, supplying gas to mass killings and more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben#World_War_II_and_the...
Agreed on by multiple large scientific bodies, including the EPA.
Nah, they just reacted to a sob story. No different than NIMBYs playing up the "grandma vs evil developers", politicians pulling a "just think of the children", etc. Utterly disgusting.