IMO the only clear window into this are victim surveys.
A look at the link[0] provided by GP provides the source[1] of the data, and AFAICT, both UCR and NIBRS statistics reflect reported crimes, not convictions.
So, no they don't. But feel free to ignore the actual data sources if they don't fit with your beliefs. Lots of people seem to do that. It makes life so much simpler, no?
A fair point. And thank you for your observation.[0]
However, GP made an assumption that wasn't supported by, well, anything in anyone's posts or any of the supporting data in an (apparent) attempt to justify their point of view.
I just said the quiet part out loud and gave GP license to continue using unsupported assumptions to justify their views.
If pointing that out is considered inappropriate by some, then so be it.
[0] I want to clarify that I really do appreciate your comment and am absolutely not being snarky or sarcastic when I say so.
Nope.
>I have,
Sucks to be you, I guess.
Please do share where you lived where your public servants are so crappy so I know never to go there. Thanks!
Especially since WRT property crime (which is what we're discussing here), filing an insurance claim requires providing access to an actual police report that can be provided (by the police) to the insurance company in order to get your claim processed.
Again, please let us know which jurisdiction(s) (and please, be specific) it is that refuses to take reports of property crime. Thanks!
Edit: Fixed usage.
Now we have more brazen smash and grabs with big hauls, idiots with trash bags an calculators being posted on social media, and porch pirates for which we see countless Ring videos?