Hacker News Reader

I look forward to seeing the Gell-Mann amnesia the next time an obviously cooked climate study comes out and people get all worked up over nothing.

If reading that makes you upset, do you have a rational reason why? Can you explain how climate science is immune to the social dynamics at work here? Or is it just knee-jerk offense at having your religious beliefs questioned?

View on HN

Can you clarify what you mean please? And what evidence you have to support the social dynamics whichever way you are saying they are being swayed?

This is a genuine question because I may be the one with the religious beliefs, but I am not beyond them being questioned.

The difference here is that anti-warming studies are the ones with the money behind them. Your conspiracy theory is falsified in that one stroke.

don't kid yourself - there is plenty of money to be made on both sides of the climate misinformation industry.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com