That's essentially a population replacement on the planet-scale, isn't it?
There's also a huge historic and geographic factor, specifically colonialism, that creates connections for immigration that would otherwise be unlikely. It's not like this is some clockwork system where every citizen migrates to the richest country that can reach at any given time. It's people, by the tens of millions, making the best decisions they can for themselves and their family based on the political and economic realities.
It's not nearly 1:1 with the current situations in the US and Europe, respectively.
I'm just saying that mass immigration has effects on the country, the people, the economy/housing, the way of life, etc.
People should fully understand this and then vote accordingly. It's something to openly discuss and digest, not something to be swept under the rug or "downvoted".
If you ever want to have a reasonable, productive conversation about immigration, don't use words like 'replacement' that almost everyone knows are racially charged.
And by the way I upvoted your original comment for visibility because I believe these issues should be discussed openly.
Replacement is defined as "a person or thing that takes the place of another"... when a town has 100 people who are German, and then in the future it is 50 Germans and 50 French -- the Germans have been half replaced by the French. It's a simple term, and I'm using it 100% as it is defined in our English language.
Given these facts as I've laid out, it is really quite inflammatory to call a proposition "BS" - especially without any contradictory evidence provided.
Free speech is vital to a functional democratic society.
i am lucky i cant be called a racist by them as i am myself an immigrant but as I prefer programming rather than woke politics I am quite factual and this is indeed a blatant fact than can be proven by any kind of statistics
It's very hard for people on both ends of the spectrum to take, analyze, and respond to a statement by itself and not to the person who is saying it.
That's completely irrelevant.
Even leaving aside the "conspiracy" aspect there is a valid point in using the term "replacement" to describe the trend when you combine the effect of immigration and relative birth rates.
Worth noting that a few down votes have no reflection on the truth or accuracy of a particular comment, they are merely an expression of opinion and/or ignorance - in much the same way my comments are simply an opinion and/or ignorance.