Those practices are what make those open source projects possible.
No money, no open source projects.
No money, no open source projects.
The people responsible for the opioid crisis also donated a lot of money to philanthropy. If people told us “no shady opioid practices, no philanthropy” we would all assume they were being absurd. Because that statement is absurd as the one you made saying that without Meta’s shady practices we wouldn’t have those open source projects.
Also Meta’s open source projects do have a benefit to Meta. If they didn’t, Meta would never open source them. It’s part of Meta’s business strategy.
Turns out free beer tastes really good, regardless how it was produced back in the farm.
I should not be surprised, it is hardly different from enjoying products that people know are coming from sweet shops, but hey they are so cool.
I think what you are saying is that it would be immoral to make generic medicine based based on q design that was originally invented by a big pahrma company because you are supporting the exploitation fo sick people, which is honestly compeletly absurd