The reason we can have content that is not AI-generated junk is that someone somewhere pays for it. If everyone runs uBlock then ad revenue will go to near zero and the only content worth posting will also have to cost nearly nothing. We'll be swimming in nothing but AI-generated spam.
Speaking of personal biases, I don't mind paying by any means... but that only works when it's an option. There is no way to pay Google to remove search ads (short of building and maintaining privately hosted front end for the API which does everything google.com and associated does) so I have a $99/y personal account and run uBlock Origin. On other things worth too small an amount to be worth the transaction cost or just plain not something you can pay for I leave the blocker on - if not enough of us are interested in paying to remove ads for it to be a worthwhile method then it's probably not going to result in the downfall of the service for those of us to block them. Similarly I pay for YouTube Premium but if I find myself on a computer I can't or shouldn't log into I don't mind utilizing an ad blocker. Heck, this has gotten to be such a complex topic I'm a paying user for YouTube and subscribe to a Patreon only to need an adblocker to skip the sponsored sections of the video! It can really get quite interesting how people consider these different nuances in different ways. Anything from just don't care about the effects to it being impossible to use any sort of ad blocker morally and everything in-between.
I also don't really mind AI generated stuff, it's no more always spam and junk than the human generated web - and it's not really free either, just cheaper. That's probably getting a little disconnected from search provider consumption though.
It’s a really nice internet these days but I can’t judge or compare the nuances since I never used gmail, chrome or Google