The above goods and services can simply be “stability” relative to the rest of the world, such that wealth seeking a safe haven continues to choose assets denominated in they nation’s currency.
The above goods and services can simply be “stability” relative to the rest of the world, such that wealth seeking a safe haven continues to choose assets denominated in they nation’s currency.
That is really a statement without a real point. Countries can of course print currency to keep covering their debt obligations but that just impoverishes their citizens and means they lose access to debt markets (effectively).
I know people make this statement a lot, but I never really understand what point they're trying to make.
It sounds like they're trying to claim "free lunch" but I don't really know.
Can you name an instance in which a developed country, borrowing in its own currency, has defaulted? I can't, at least not since the end of the gold standard.