* >1G internet in a mostly or exclusively wifi home
* <=1G internet + a 2.5G LAN, so that ethernet <=> wifi and ethernet<=>SSD transfers are faster
The second scenario could actually fit me right now, but my ISP is expecting to roll out multi-gigabit options later this year year.
At any rate, I agree with everyone else, I would prefer two 2.5G ports.
Seems to really limit the audience and shorten the useful life of a router to penny pinch. How about a $88 NanoPi with dual 2.5G, 4GB ram, 32GB eMMC, and wifi? Is it really worth $10 to have 1/4th the ram, 1/256th the storage, 1G instead of 2.5G and less CPU[0]?
I got similar with the faster RK3588, 8GB ram, dual 2.5 and 1G, and metal case for $120. I've been quite impressed, it's about half as fast as my xeon E3-1230 from years ago.
2. Mediatek might not be willing to provide their WiFi SoC if you are not using their compute SoC, and Rockchip doesn't have any WiFi chips.
The rk3588 is frankly a non-starter.
There are some China-only ZTE devices that do this, but they obviously have a different order volume and scale that makes it possible. (The main SoC is replaced with a ZXIC one, a ZTE subsidiary)