Seems reasonable. Is this supposed to be a bad thing?
Seems reasonable. Is this supposed to be a bad thing?
Where I'm from, the same discussion appears every two years, when the government tries once more to shutdown FM radio. Luckily, they always get shut down by the people. Maybe don't try to shut down public services that millions of people actually rely on.
in the US, what killed FM radio is the death of independent stations with local DJs, replaced by nationwide corporate homogeneity
That said, I don't understand what's so hard about just running both digital and analog in parallel for 20 or even 30 years. This would create an incentive to upgrade to the new, digital standard (better quality, more programming etc.) without outright cutting millions of people and their legacy devices off.
The US arguably did a better job transitioning to digital radio by using a digital system (HD radio) that seamlessly falls back to an analog AM or FM signal, and they have more constraints in terms of broadcast licensing restrictions than most other countries.
Is this sarcasm? Just in case it is not:
Maybe 12 years ago, I had a device with sideloading that allowed me to run Plex (genuinely used for photo viewing). NowTV removed side-loading via a forced update and thus removed the principle reason I bought that device rather than another. Bought a FireTV stick after that and downloaded Plex from their appstore.
Google did exactly this when it shut down Google Reader in 2013. Feedly saw an influx of 3 million new users in the two weeks following the shutdown.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170721090528/https://blog.feed...
The second paragraph mentions that 2G will be around for a decade or so longer, so that's the route voice will take.