The article's findings are also backed by data on Eunuchs who live almost 20 years longer than non-castrated men.
Now the real question is: Are Bryan Johnson and his followers willing to take logical next step?
The question is why this is the case... if it's historical data, it may simply be correlation, not causation, as in most societies eunuchs were prized and highly privileged compared to the general populations as the noblemen in power didn't see them as a threat to their biological line aka their wives (due to the obvious lack of balls and, in many cases, the penis). And no matter the era, those in privileged positions always enjoyed a longer lifespan due to the accessibility of consistent and higher-quality nutrition as well as healthcare.
The only thing coming close that we do have data for (simply out of ethical reasons) is pets and farm animals, and at least for pets there is some reduction in a few reproductive tract-related cancers (well, duh, what's taken out can't grow a cancer) [1] and higher life expectancy due to less fights.
[1] https://www.cats.org.uk/farnham/news/the-importance-of-neute...
Hah, thanks. I never made that connection.