"The author has no expertise in the field. If your claim is that they're a "scientist""

Are you intentionally missreading me? I never claimed that the author of the article is a scientist. I said the article is quite ok compared to the average pop science article, which is indeed often clickbait. But here there were no promises, just the very correct claim, that there is great potential.

And the scientist the article is talking about, John Eichelberger, for sure has publications:

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=XtohsgUAAAAJ

So, I am asking again, can you point out one single lie or exaggeration in this concrete article? Because I cannot find one, but like I said, I am not an expert. So if you know more, please share that knowledge.