I wouldn't mind paying $5 more for a book if >90% of it went to the author.
I wouldn't mind paying $5 more for a book if >90% of it went to the author.
Agreed, but it is (somewhat) justified by the sheer length of the chain (printing house, distributors, bookstores etc.)
FWIW, I wrote and self-published a book on a 99% automated platform (e-book only), and I get 80% royalties.
Another (anec)datapoint: I published a book (this time not written by me) in a more "traditional" way (i.e., on paper). The book is pretty niche, had 0 marketing expenses (we basically only relied on word-of-mouth). We kept the costs low, but not too low (we paid a bit for nice typesetting, illustrations, good paper etc.). We did not even try to put it in bookstores and only sold it via Internet (using an ebay-style platform, not even a custom e-commerce solution; we didn't even had a landing page with a our own domain!). This allowed us to break even after a few months, which I think is insane comparing to the "big book" (aka publishing industry).
Would you mind sharing which platform this is?
His take went from 70% on Amazon to just 7% w/ the traditional publisher.
Of course the traditional publisher handles all marketing and distribution, so hopefully the slimmer percentage of a much bigger pie works out.
But I was amazed at how low the final percentage was.
You can try solving this by industry-wide regulations, but that would make average price of books much higher, and will likely steer readers to other medias, shift revenues to already established writers, or both.
I could see this being true for non-fiction, but for fiction? I'm generally not looking at price, I'm looking at whether the story seems interesting.
Two books can both be about space battles (or whatever your topic of choice is), but one can seem extremely interesting while the other doesn't. Similar topics doesn't really mean much compared to everything else (writing style, characters, etc.)
Also known as "price fixing".