Hacker News Reader

Low-code or no-code is okay with small apps. But as complexity increases, you won’t have fine control or scalability needed using these tools.

Low code may be better for mvp. Once you have enough revenue moving to a code based solution will be better in long run.

View on HN

> Low-code or no-code is okay with small apps. But as complexity increases, you won’t have fine control or scalability needed using these tools.

Won't a better approach be a low-code tool that grows with your needs? It would seem to be a waste to build an mvp in a low-code* environment and then throw away all the learnings and rebuild it in a code-based solution.

*=the assumption is that low-code is not no-code, i.e., the mvp would have some amount of code that would be throw away.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com