I think the real question is whether OpenAI should be allowed to charge for generating infringing content. Even though the unit cost of the Mario drawing is negligible, the sum total of their infringing outputs may be making them a lot of money.
I think the real question is whether OpenAI should be allowed to charge for generating infringing content. Even though the unit cost of the Mario drawing is negligible, the sum total of their infringing outputs may be making them a lot of money.
Well, are they really doing that?
If I rent a server to host a minecraft instance, is the company "charging for a minecraft server"? It is not clear to me that by charging users for AI usage they are complicit for whatever is generated. We don't require Adobe to prevent people from drawing Mickey either.
but "making money = infringement" is folk wisdom. you could certainly say making money attracts attention and increases likelihood of legal action
So I suppose the question will hang on whether OpenAI is "publishing" if it returns similarly infringing results for the same prompts, even though those results are individually generated for a given user query.