Probably meaning that they'd lose their jobs if they solved the problem.
It isn't that Nike (or whoever) wants to employ children, what they really want is to not get caught employing children. And they also don't want to pay higher wages, and they don't want to pay supply chain auditors. So if they can get away with paying a rubber-stamp auditor, they can claim they did their due diligence and wash their hands of it.
Rather than regulatory body “random” selection for audit, private sector actually gets say in who is picked for their own audit, and if those auditors “find things” those auditors are no longer picked, and thus lose their jobs.
I don’t know if child labour auditing is specifically impacted by this issue, but most definitely other forms of audit and bargaining are.