If ROI is more interesting then why not a comparison with what the ROI of other individuals might have been had they had a starting investment?
Also, why should ROI be most interesting? Is money all we care about? Why is it that we have money?
Also, why should ROI be most interesting? Is money all we care about? Why is it that we have money?
You're talking about a "what if" as opposed to concrete numbers we do a simple comparison of.
> Is money all we care about?
No, but in the context of the article, it is the metric.
The point is to challenge the premise that their success was only a product of their starting investment.