Strong disagree, because "Diseases caused by poverty" is a GIVEN.
In that context, "...eliminated by science" is unambiguously good news.
Not good? What is good thing: eliminate disease or keep it to spread?
I'm just putting words into ancestors post, but my guess is that it's disingenuous to congratulate yourself for solving a man made problem. Poverty doesn't have to be a given unless you ascribe to specific world views. You could solve a disease caused by poverty, or you know.. solve poverty so that the need to cure this disease is zero.
Poverty isn't a man made problem. It's the default state of nature, which was true for most humans in the history of our species. We can't solve it overnight. It takes decades of gradually increasing a society's wealth from subsistence farming to full industrialization. It's definitely possible to do it more quickly than we did in the Western world (~200 years), as evidenced by the progress that China and India have made toward eliminating extreme poverty in the last 20 years. But it's naive to think that we can just snap our fingers and solve poverty for the rest of the world. In the mean time, it totally makes sense to try and alleviate the suffering of people in poverty in whatever ways we can.