Your beliefs are worthless to everyone else if you can't explain them, and no all you've done so far is declare what you believe to be correct, and have crumpled at the slightest sign of resistance. That demonstrates the weakness of your belief.
If you're here to win debates for the sake of it, you can have the last word.
I only mentioned those beliefs and I'm not interested in debating them in a hacker news thread, right now.
This is useful because if anyone else reads this, they will get a pretty standard idea of how people who think like you can’t really justify their beliefs when challenged.
I do appreciate it, but I doubt you do. Easier to dismiss me and ignore any dissent, than it is to consider that you might actually be the bad guy here.
I told you this approach weakens your advocacy. Too bad you can’t listen.
This branch of the thread was just about a mention of some ideas that I have no intention to discuss right now.
Not that you offered any support for your ideas, other than "I think that my constitution says so".
If you're for freedom of companies corrupting politicians and politicians lying to everyone, you're free to be, maybe you're on the side who benefits from it.
I was hoping to have closed the discussion about eight messages ago, I'm not really here for this.