> Even if people drove short distances there is no clause signed when purchasing a car that you cant drive it short distances. I bought the vehicle to drive it as i see fit. If i cant then its not fit for purpose, end of story.
I totally agree. From your explanation, you have an active regen DPF, which IMHO shouldn't even exist. If your exhaust gasses arent hot enough to passively regenerate then you shouldn't have a diesel, and its something you should have been made aware of.
These active regen DPFs exist to burn off (i.e. release the particulates) that were previously collected in the event that the DPF starts to get blocked due to not enough high temp for passive regeneration. For urban diesel drivers, this basically means that the DPF collects the particulates, and then just actively regen and releases them - defeating the point of a DPF. They are indiscriminate, and are just as likely to release particulates in the same environment in which they would otherwise trap them (short journeys in a city). These things basically result in the vehicle passing emission tests by saving the particulates, and then releasing them later in the same environment. It amazes me they are allowed.
Anyway - thats not your fault - just me ranting about how pointless an active regen DPF is :) I hope that one day regulation realises that and clamps down on them.