> it can do anything a human can do.
So it can get up and walk down the street?
Not trying to be pedantic, but when one is defining things, one needs to be precise.
So it can get up and walk down the street?
Not trying to be pedantic, but when one is defining things, one needs to be precise.
Do you want a list of the kinds of afflictions that stunt these ?
For the ones that can't, they don't deserve to be called intelligent ?
What any of that has to do with intelligence is honestly beyond me.
99.9% percent of them are, and those that aren't would be considered malformed.
> For the ones that can't, they don't deserve to be called intelligent? What any of that has to do with intelligence is honestly beyond me.
You haven't been paying attention to this thread, yet you reply to it? Please reread it, in particular the parent's argument I was responding to. Such context would be helpful to have when responding to me, yes?
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1734763060244386074
Boston Dynamics’ Atlas it’s probably a more capable robot at the moment but Optimus will be much better position to act as an embodied agent in the next few years.
I can currently take an AI for a walk on my laptop, that's not the same as them being able to go for a walk.
Lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnkM0AecxYA
This is far from the first of this class of LLM robots too https://tidybot.cs.princeton.edu/
Anyhow, it’s too late for “AGI” and “superintelligence”, aside from the baggage they also suffer from being in everyone’s domain to do with as they please. Precise terms inherently cannot be abused like this (compare “sore throat” to “acute viral laryngitis”).