Hacker News Reader

Comment by jacquesm | Hacker News Reader

So, the solution is not to play on a battlefield where the AI has an advantage.

Instead play with humans and have fun.

Meanwhile all battlefields will one-by-one become battlefields where the AI has the advantage. Because in the end almost every contest between humans is either one based on strength or on speed and the AI will always be able to match us for speed.

And strength has long been the domain of machines, couple machines with AI and you lose all of these as well and you lose them faster.

The biggest question to me is this one: "Does it matter?" Do we really care if there is an entity that is smarter than we are? Because after all all of the battlefields are of our own making. And I think the answer is yes because the first thing that tends to happen with new tech is that it is weaponized. And weaponized AI could easily translate into dominance by whichever party gets to it first.

View on HN

> And strength has long been the domain of machines, couple machines with AI and you lose all of these as well and you lose them faster.

I don't think rock climbers need to worry about Stockfish.

We're going to lose to specialized machines every time while putting to shame any general purpose machines of our own creation. At least for a while yet no machine is going to match the breadth of our capabilities and our self-sufficiency.

It's no surprise that something that is optimized for being capable of many things can get beaten by a thing optimized for a single purpose.

Say, you get a super-human chess AI, and a super-human accountant AI, and a super-human medical doctor AI, and a super-human material design AI, and a super-human lawyer AI, and… How many of these do you need in a bunch when it's going to be better than, most people at most things? You say that people are great generalists but what if there going to be a specialised "conductor" AI that is super-human at establishing communication between specialised AIs and dividing tasks super-humanly efficiently between them?

So when to start worrying?

Rock climbing = personal entertainment. That's why rock climbers don't need to worry about Stockfish. But competitive chess players do have to worry about Stockfish.

There is competitive rock climbing. Rock climbing isn't all about physical strength, you have to pick your route. Eventually some military robot company will want to prove that its combat bot can out perform humans on any terrain. And we'll see best humans vs matches that can match and a few years later beat their performance.

Of course the professional competitors don't have to worry about competing against a human that's cheating using a robot; the exoskeleton would be obvious.

But it isn't unimaginable that, in some distant future, nanobots could be inject to infiltrate our muscles and tendons, and then assemble in to fibers that would assimilate with them and look normal from the outside. Competitions are won by incredibly small percentages.

I like to keep my science fiction and real world concerns firewalled off from each other. I sleep bad enough as it is.

How is that a unique threat vs steroids?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com