We always debate this topic, CyberDildonics.
You were wrong last time you debated me on AI porn. It's here [1, 2].
Movies are next.
> Anyone with a few hundred dollars can buy mics, steady cams, action cams and more off of amazon that would give them quality above the black and white or 16mm film that some directors started out on.
I've been down this path, and frankly it sucks.
The task: tell a visual story.
The current process: script, edit, break down with AD, location scout, secure filming rights to a location, go to a rental house and get equipment, get insurance, find camera crew that can handle it, rent lights, get gels, go to a prop house, pick props, rent props, transport props to set, set dec, run electrical, light set, do blocking, rehearse, film, retake, film, reset, capture photons, smear pixels around with an editing package for three months.
This ceremony freaking sucks. It's so far divorced from the objective at hand, it's more primitive than punch cards, and nothing is reusable. I absolutely hate it. And I've always hated it. It needs to die. These steps have nothing to do with storytelling. It's vestigial and is an artifact of our primitive technologies.
The task is to convey visual stories. Not to play dress up, logistics, and awkward gridded photon capture.
Anyway, movies are next. I'll eat my hat if they're not. The current filmmaking process is as dumb as bloodletting. And it feels about the same.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32711614
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35523656