Gotcha. One rule for me and another for thee.
It says a lot about people when they'd prefer to believe a comfortable lie, than be told an uncomfortable truth.
I never once defended Musk's idiocy, but you've made it clear that you have no problems with child abuse, anti-Semitism, or hypocrisy.
Best of luck to ya.
> The End.
You're bounding off into the irrelevant tundra, desperately hoping that it is somehow relevant to Disney not advertising on Twitter.
It isn't.
Commenting on Disney paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material is irrelevant in a thread about Disney not paying money to an allegedly antisemetic company.
Sorry, I suppose it's another "whataboutism"...
You are profoundly confused.
What an absurdly childish response to GP’s comments. GP has made none of those things “clear” and it’s disgusting that you would stoop to such a gross, inflammatory accusation because you’re upset about an internet argument.
Grow up or log off. This crap is a really, really ugly look for you.
It's an ugly look for me to suggest that someone has strange priorities if they're defending Disney for paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material? I guess we're only allowed to judge antisemetic companies if they're owned by Elon Musk...
It's an ugly look for you to look the other way. Silence is violence remember.
You spinning that into “actually that means you approved of CSAM” is teenage Twitter bullshit, frankly. Again, grow up.