The appropriations bill example also looks right—the insertion doesn’t stylistically match the rest of the document. I’m much more skeptical of evaluations if this is how the sausage gets made. Feels like bullshit artistry.
Some third party did these tests first (in article and spread on social) to which the makers of Claude are responding.
I knew it’s a weird test right when I first encountered it.
Interesting that the Claude team felt like it’s worth responding to.