yes, those countries, because the alternative is a war of all against all.
there were winners and losers a century ago, the lines on the map are what they are now, you don't get a do-over. deal with it.
there were winners and losers a century ago, the lines on the map are what they are now, you don't get a do-over. deal with it.
To this day the area disputed is largely lawless jungle with no agreed territorial line. It is very much a modern question due to this loosely defined state.
If the goal is to avoid war of all against all, can't the US suck it up for once?