Another paper in a long series that confuses "our tests against currently available LLMs tuned for specific tasks found that they didn't perform well on our task" with "LLMs are architecturally unsuitable for our task".
LLM names an specific product, aimed at solving an specific problem.
Think of it this way: the more thrust you get, the farther you'll go before control problems start to manifest. Keep pushing, and eventually the rest of the craft becomes a rounding error in the math :).
I will limit myself to saying that more thrust without control just means you're going faster when you crash.
Correct.
Note that the problem specification talks about flying, and says nothing about the landing or surviving it.
If you've found some, please let everyone know.
If you've found some, please let everyone know.