I don't know how you can say "this is not a serious topic" when:

> The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled for Jarkesy in 2022.

And, of course, the Supreme Court is actually taking up the hearing, which they wouldn't do unless there were real issues to address.

I am in no way qualified to determine the validity of arguments on either side, but your offhand dismissal stands in stark contrast to the judges that obviously disagree, and who ruled differently.