There’s no reason to be a couch potato and just get up to walk 50 steps a day. This is a terrible, terrible opening paragraph. We need to get over this “choose this, not that” meme when it comes to making healthy choices.
When someone is looking up the mountain, trying to start climbing its far less intimidating to start with a 50 step mountain, not a 10,000 step one.
This isn't about appealing to, or helping you. It's about appealing to and helping those that wouldn't have otherwise walked those 50 steps.
From the study, near the top:
> Participants who stopped stair climbing between baseline and resurvey had a higher risk of ASCVD compared with those who never climbed stairs.
Additionally, your comment’s assumptions about my lifestyle are inaccurate, but that’s irrelevant to discussing the article and study.
I think after several generations that experience mortality at younger ages because of obesity, there might be an honest discussion of how bad being sedentary and overweight is for your health. Until then you have liberal rhetoric equating any acknowledgement of this reality to an accusation that someone is a bad person for being fat.
I think there's a huge difference between Israel the country and government and Jews for example.
Criticising Jews is generalisation because they're not one entity and not all the same. One Jewish person is not responsible for the actions of the others. So yeah criticism is automatically discrimination and in this case antisemitism. You can criticise individuals for their actions but not generalise that over a whole people.
The state of Israel, well that is a singular entity with a clear power structure and certainly can be criticized for its actions. I don't think that amounts to antisemitism. Because Israel isn't made up of only Jews.
And trans people, why do people feel the need to criticize them? Let them be who they are, they're not harming anyone. Maybe your holy book says it's wrong, well you can apply it to yourself but not others who don't follow your beliefs.
And yeah obesity is bad. I'm obese as well and I know that. It's just very hard to do something about it, the same way you can't tell a depressed person to just be happy. Some people have a huge tendency to gain weight and overeat. People without this problem underestimate the difficulty.
What helped me was a coworker who told me about his yearly fast, how he prepared and the difficulties (the first two days are the hardest). After the 5-day fast, I found it way easier to ignore my hunger and start IF (now I mostly eat less tbh).
If you want to try, here are my adices:
- If you have big health troubles (if you're diabetic), ask your doctor. It might be a bad idea.
- Do your fast during spring, late spring specifically. Sun helps a lot with mood and motivation Prepare how you enter the fast.
- The previous 3 days, I was on a mostly ketogenic diet (greens, eggs, poultry, meat, butter, avocado, falafels)
- No medecine. See point 1. Medicine will break your fast. Prior to the fast I took nutrients (vitamin D, magnesium) (I did a blood test before obviously).
- Prepare to drink a lot of water. I added lemon juice in small quantities (for electrolytes, and taste). Tea might be OK too.
- The worst day was the second (the first was easy either). I wasn't able to do anything. Prepare for it, stock interesting books, play video games, find ways to forgot about your hunger. It will physically hurt. Each time it does, drink water. Also, prepare a book rather than screen time on the evening, falling asleep sooner will help.
- Once I passed the second day I was mostly okay. I was pretty tired and weak the 3rd, but I was able to exercise and go out the 4th and 5th (my libido also increased a lot, beware). I stopped the 5th day because it was my object (and I was visiting friends the rest of the week), but I could have lasted longer, and probably worked without issue from the 4th day onward.
Sorry again if it's unsolicited. Hopefully you find something that works for you (and I'll be happy if my dices helped anyone who was in my situation).
But it wasn't as bad as I expected, the Hunger feelings just went away. But when I did eat it was very hard to not over-indulge because cravings returned.
The criticism is this: a woman's right to a single-sex spaces cannot co-exist with the desire of a male to enter these spaces based on his claims of 'gender identity'. When the desires of the latter are prioritised above the needs of the former, this causes actual harm.
And really, they're not coming into the stall with anyone else. There's still private space there. So the purported problem just appears at the sink. Many places have unisex bathrooms now too. And/or not gender-matching cleaning staff.
Also it's kinda rude misgendering trans females. They aren't males.
1. Males who identify as women are a heterogenous group that mostly consist of those who have not undergone the 'whole transition' (by which I assume you mean the cosmetic surgery on their genitals, alongside long-term hormonal intervention), with a significant proportion having no intention of doing so. Notably this group includes many males who do not pass as women at all, and who do not seem to put much effort into achieving that aim. Yet still insist that they should have access to women's single-sex spaces based on their 'gender identity'.
2. Women's bathrooms aren't the only single-sex space that males who identify as women desire to enter. Others include: prisons, locker rooms, refuges from domestic abuse and sexual violence, nude spas, sports competitions, support groups for issues that only apply to the female body like pregnancy, menstruation and menopause. Essentially any single-sex space may be coveted by these males.
3. It isn't sufficient to consider this issue only from the perspective of these males and the fulfillment of their desires. The women who these single-sex spaces are actually intended for, and who need these spaces for various reasons including safety, dignity and privacy, must be recognised too, and really should be the group centred in any discussion of this.
Also regarding the objection to 'misgendering': this is another example of how women's spaces are imposed upon by these males. In this case, attempting to occupy the same linguistic space, and by doing so, removing language that may be used to distinguish them in discussions such as this.
Yes, there are plenty of men who do this.
Misgendering? This isn't reddit the people on HN are not likely to kowtow to your lunatic revisionism, no matter how much anyone gets downvoted.
Maybe there is a gender which is biologically male, mentally female with lesbian tendencies, and they want to feel intimate that way. So why not?
It's not some pill you just pop. It's a difficult path of psychological evaluations and hormonal and surgical procedures. Expensive and very invasive and it's not granted on a whim. You really have to be female in your identity.
I really don't see any CIS man taking hormones and surgery that make them more feminine just to get a peek in the girls' bathroom. They don't desecrate themselves that way. If they want to peek there's easier ways, like putting up cameras (sadly it happens) or putting on a maintenance overall or whatever.
And for feeling intimate there's clubs and bars for that :) In my experience trans people usually tend to date other trans people or at least those in "LGBTQI+ and allies" circles. Because they know about the difficulties and feel more of a connection.
I think news people tried to throw that at the wall for a little while, but it didn't stick.
Israel isn't just taboo. They actively destroy opposition by getting people fired, prevent them from getting funding (important in politics), and have entire call centers staffed tasked with forum sliding and demoralization. See the JIDF (it never stopped contrary to the lies on Wikipedia).
There's a move to destigmatise obesity, but the academics who support that still want to lower obesity, which is not the same thing as other protected groups.
The problem is that we have no strategy for long term weight loss that actually works. This is probably related to the fact that we have no idea what is causing the obesity epidemic to begin with. There are tons of theories, though.
No there is a growing segment of the population that has no idea being sedentary leads to weight gain, as well as a segment that thinks being overweight is ok or healthy. Perhaps you're not as in-touch with the rhetoric of the younger generation.
Ah, yes, the approach that ignores any of the psychological root causes of diseases that are clearly partially psychological.
It also happens that telling people things in an empathy less way can backfire. The solution to obesity is not as simple as your experience makes you think - or it would already be a solved problem.
Meanwhile Fewer kids are walking or biking to school than ever before, setting them up for a lifetime of sedentarism and it's consequences. The obesity rate will continue it's steady march upwards and to the right.
Our diets haven't gotten meaningfully worse in the past quarter century. per capita sugar consumption peaked in the mid 90s, but obesity rates have continued to rise, steadily.