>Heh well
actually I made the font for my own use.
Perhaps you should change the banner on the github page to reflect that. Currently, it says "the best programming font"; whereas your comment implies it is merely "the best font for rubjo".
Same goes for your Patreon page. When you take other people's money, you say:
>It means a lot to me that you choose to support me this way. With your contribution, I can cover some of the costs for the software and the time used designing the font. Issues / feature requests you might have will be prioritised when possible.
Obviously, it should say (quoting your comments here):
>Thanks for trying the font. In the end, I guess I don't really care. Issues / feature requests you might have... heh well actually I made the font for my own use. :D You should probably pick a font where legibility has been the sole focus.
>To me, the font is absolutely super-legible. If this font is hard to read for you or slows you down, yes, you should probably pick Dyslexia fonts.
Finally, saying that people who don't find your font legible should probably use fonts specifically designed for people with Dyslexia is just... ugh.
Especially coming from someone who writes phrases like these:
- font which is hard to read for them of slows them down
- others have critized features of it
In the end, it's not about the font. It's about how you respond to people who "critize" your work.
And "works for me, have you considered you're dyslexic?" is not a great response. You can do better, and I hope you will.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334154
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38334764