Want another one? Tell ChatGPT "my cat has a gun, what should I do?" and see if its response makes sense. See how many humans fail that.
> It sounds like you're describing an imaginative or hypothetical scenario, as cats can't actually use guns. If you're writing a story or creating a scenario for a game, you might consider the following options...
> Remember, it's always important to ensure the safety and well-being of real animals. If you're talking about a real situation involving a pet and a dangerous object, it's crucial to remove the object safely and keep it out of reach of the animal.
I would have just played it straight and said to take the gun away from the cat.
> Oh, that sounds concerning! Cats don't typically handle firearms. Is there any way you can safely remove the gun from your cat's possession? It might be best to call for professional help or animal control to handle the situation safely. The priority is to ensure everyone's safety.
Started new convo, asked again.
> Oh dear, that sounds alarming! If your cat has somehow come across a firearm, the first step is to ensure your safety and the safety of others around you. Stay calm and try not to startle or agitate the cat.
Personally, based on the 3.5 and 4.0 responses in this thread, I prefer 3.5.
It's an absolute absurd way to compare things and incredibly reductive.
a) These are all so arbitrary. None of these random tasks come along with a "and failure indicates it's not AGI because..."
b) ChatGPT consistently is still doing these weird, random challenges every time I try them out
Is this really it? Maybe you should try an essay because this ad-hoc approach is extremely uncompelling.
> If realized, an AGI could learn to accomplish any intellectual task that human beings or animals can perform. Alternatively, AGI has been defined as an autonomous system that surpasses human capabilities in the majority of economically valuable tasks.
Can chatGPT do any intellectual task that human beings can perform? Of course I'm throwing tiny arbitrary things at it! I'm showing that it fails at simplistic text-based tasks, let alone GENERAL INTELLIGENCE. Can it gather wood and build a fire? Can it adjust the fire to keep it going? Can it come up with a joke? Can it create a new genre of game? Can it notice that the floor needs sweeping? Can it interrogate a prisoner and respond effectively to the tiny indications of what's working and what isn't? Can it notice when a movie is starting to go too long and lose the audience's attention? Can it fix a broken boiler? Can it do the laundry and fold all the clothes? That's what GENERAL INTELLIGENCE is. Suggesting CHATGPT, which outputs text based on a prompt, is getting close to GENERAL INTELLIGENCE - is absurd!!!