This article presents no source for this claim, and the rest of the article is re-hashing stuff that has been well covered
This is clickbait - publications should report on facts and confirmed sources, not speculate and try to get clicks.
This is clickbait - publications should report on facts and confirmed sources, not speculate and try to get clicks.
It's no more credible than the reporter, and I've never heard of this one.
And even if you don't use BAT, it is still an ad-driven business.