That text does not disclaim support, security bugfixes, and future development. On the contrary, all three of those things are probably either heavlily implied or outright stated to be available on the project web site.
Can you explain how you got to that interpretation from that phrasing?
> SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
And how is future development and / or support not covered under servicing of that clause?
> THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW.
I genuinely don't understand what's so difficult to grasp here.
Nobody expects that. But people do reasonably expect a project to recieve updates, security fixes, and new releases.
It's not reasonable to expect a project to receive updates, security fixes, and new releases for software projects the author put on the Internet explicitly with a license saying it's warrantied for no purpose, both explicit and implicit.
Your starting point is to selectively ignore parts of the authors explicitly chosen license.
It's sophistry.