If some mechanism or capability is no longer possible or is made infeasible for adblockers to control, then ads will simply switch to using that mechanism. It's a pretty obvious outcome. You cannot simply give just an inch with adtech.
If some mechanism or capability is no longer possible or is made infeasible for adblockers to control, then ads will simply switch to using that mechanism. It's a pretty obvious outcome. You cannot simply give just an inch with adtech.
- Now any block filter list will have be updated with a plugin update. So no fetching lists from links directly.
- strict blocking ability [1]
- No dynamic filtering [2]
- No Custom lists (own or third party by the user)
- Element Picker [3]
[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Strict-blocking [2] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode [3] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Element-picker
https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/151#issuecomment...
Google is an advertising company. Chrome extensions already experienced a lost decade, where nothing much happened until the Manifest V3 "proposal". It's not a good idea to let Google hold the keys to anti-tracking tech.
[1] I stand corrected, DNS lookups are not part of webRequest in MV2 Chrome either. This doesn't change my larger point.
But Chrome never had CNAME filtering before either