https://support.fairphone.com/hc/en-us/articles/983618898804...
https://support.fairphone.com/hc/en-us/articles/983618898804...
Completely unacceptable explanation to me, but at least there is a writeup of their position.
How and why?
> Part of that strategy is ... not including those that are becoming less pervasive, such as the headphone jack.
For a phone with a mission like the Fairphone, the headphone jack will not become less pervasive. An audio standard that has existed for over 100 years will not vanish in 5, especially not without a valid alternative. On the contrary, it's a must have feature to support their mission. So this whole line of reasoning is just wrong.
> To support maximum longevity and because of the IP rating, Fairphone 4 does not feature a headphone jack
If you look at other phones with a good IP rating, they can come with a headphone jack and be fine. The Sony Xperia line has some modern examples.
> Including the headphone jack would have made the phone longer and thicker.
Given how big the phone already is, and how small phones with the headphone jack are and have been, I do not believe this. I believe that it made their job easier and changing nothing else, it would have made the phone bigger. I refuse to believe there was no alternative method to fit it in.
To note there that other vendors made the same claim, sometimes specifically for phones where there then was empty space where the headphone jack would have been. So there is a history of lies in this area, which makes this claim not trustworthy, regardless the different source. Apple lied about this with the iPhone 7, the most prominent example.
I'm not sure what this means. The oal of Fairphone is to be environmentally friendly and modular. A headphone jack being absent or present isn't directly related to either of those things.
> An audio standard that has existed for over 100 years will not vanish in 5
I mean, how long ago did Apple first announce they would be dropping it? Many other phones, tablets and laptops have also dropped it. It decidedly is vanishing, at least from consumer electronics.
> If you look at other phones with a good IP rating, they can come with a headphone jack and be fine.
Because they made different compromises than Fairphone had to.
> Given how big the phone already is, and how small phones with the headphone jack are and have been, I do not believe this
Why would they lie?
> I believe that it made their job easier and changing nothing else, it would have made the phone bigger. I refuse to believe there was no alternative method to fit it in.
I mean, they were pretty detailed in their reasoning, and you can look at their schematics online. I don't think they could have included it without making the phone chunkier and less competitive.
> which makes this claim not trustworthy, regardless the different source.
That doesn't track. Someone lie about it once so no one making the claim can be trusted? I'd say Fairphone are being pretty open and trustworthy so far.
The phone is decidedly less environmentally friendly if it leads to user ditching their existing headphone and buying ones with batteries instead. This is directly related.
To your other points, check the video by Louis Rossmann about the impact and feasibility of the headphone jack, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bRdL0StldJM&t=0s. I would only repeat myself.
EH, that's a stretch. Due to the way the industry is going, most users are going to have a pair of wireless headphones anyway. And if not, they can buy a cheap adapter that they wouldn't get rid of until they got rid of their headphones.
> To your other points, check the video by Louis Rossmann about the impact and feasibility of the headphone jack
My other points are not against the impact and feasibility of the headphone jack though. I don't have anything against it myself.
I just don't think it's reasonable to assume Fairphone is lying because Apple did, and really that seems to be the crux of your argument.