Hacker News Reader

Comment by barneygale | Hacker News Reader

> Is there even any interpretation that would allow this to be seen as anything different than industrial style IP infringement?

Parody is protected by copyright law

View on HN

There isn't a human in the loop.

Does it matter? When Google automated the scanning and digitization of millions of books for searching purposes, they were awarded Fair Use[0] protection despite using an automated system to derive unauthorized digital copies of copyright-encumbered material.

AI is clearly more derivative than that. It's too early to call for sure, but it's hard to imagine what a "victory" for copyright holders even looks like at this point.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,....

I don't know, what I do know is that every book on Google Books worth reading is behind a paywall

Yes. This is because they cannot provide you the full text of the book; that would be illegal.

They can provide you a snippet, within the legal limits of what they are able to reproduce. They can also direct you to buy a copy of it through them, if the publisher has a deal with Google. Seeing as all roads lead to Rome... most books in Google Books are also available for purchase through Google. Funny system.

If OpenAI did the same with Dall-e (provide you a snippet, within the legal limits of what they are able to reproduce. They can also direct you to buy a copy of it through them, if the publisher has a deal with [them]) things would be different.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com