I just give an example in another HN thread on a different context [1].
I am open for a 30' session showing a lot more examples.
Regarding less experienced people searching for information, try looking for health data and see what is in the top.
At Google, they recommend to go to https://www.google.com/advanced_search so you can write all the keywords you want. In this case I searched for: kvt reverse exploit [1] you can quickly see that google search results are inaccurate and it shows first my HN post because it was very recent. Also the recent article where it is also mentioned and added after I post it here in HN [2] and the following results doesn't end in some correct previous post. I then try again [3] with a more precise search adding kconsole and only found three results without all the keywords while the advanced search says explicitly that all these keywords should be there.
Am I missing something?
[1] https://www.google.com/search?as_q=kvt+reverse+exploit&as_ep...
[2] https://dgl.cx/2023/09/ansi-terminal-security
[3] https://www.google.com/search?as_q=kvt+reverse+exploit+kcons...
So it's not that Google doesn't work, it's that you're using the wrong tool for your use case. If you want highly technical content or precise keyword search you shouldn't use Google. It's like you're going on Tinder to find a marriage partner.
You are saying one day you use your mobile phone for calling and the next day the device only work for calling 0800-*?
I hate the new Google as much as others, but if you don't adapt your search habits for 20 years when the whole ecosystem around you has been obviously changing, that's kind of on you. Just use another search engine that fits your use case. Personally I use Kagi and I haven't touched Google for the last year at all.
These are worth paying for.
That tells me that the main problem may simply be that the BugTraq post on seclists.org isn’t indexed by Google at all.
While that’d be annoying, I think it’d more likely be a specific configuration or robots.txt issue with that site than being a general issue with how searches are performed.
FWIW, the same query in Kagi found the original as the second result, just under a blog mirror of your 10/20 comment and above the comment itself. Since Kagi sources from Bing (along with Google) results, that reinforces the theory that it’s an issue specific to Google’s crawl.
Contrary to your other replies, I do think your style of query continues to work well on Google (where indexed of course)—-and so do full sentences.
I honestly think the issues when there are problems finding things usually come more down to 25-plus years of searchable internet history accreting a lot of clutter (especially in spaces like tech where old info ages out but never gets deleted), along with cynical SEO from low value sites deliberately skewing results for as long as the site remains indexed.
Neither is a Google problem, and the recency bias you observed is arguably the best way to combat both. Ads and site promotion are another story, and the reason I’m on Kagi, but I don’t think that hits tech as hard as consumer spaces.
You could not have chose a more affirming counterpoint of an example.