> Apple is showing that an iPhone Pro can be used by _professionals_ to replace their existing camera
It still looks strictly worse than an equivalently priced $1000 camera+lens when directed, lit, operated, and edited by professionals.
It still looks strictly worse than an equivalently priced $1000 camera+lens when directed, lit, operated, and edited by professionals.
Also note that, according to its datasheet, the iPhone cannot capture video on its tiny 48MP sensor at that resolution at all - just 4k.
Equivalent is maybe Sigma 24-70 which is constant f/2.8 at an extra 1200 USD.
So all up ~3x more expensive than iPhone.